During a recent visit to Hendrie Valley I had the opportunity to capture a number of M.Zuiko 100-400 mm f/5-6.3 IS zoom cardinal images at 1120 mm efov. My E-M1X’s Bird Detection AI auto-focusing function and the M.Zuiko MC-14 teleconverter were used to create all of the photographs in this article.
NOTE: Click on images to enlarge.
My primary objective during this particular photography outing was to practice locating birds in my viewfinder and acquiring focus on them quickly, when using an equivalent field-of-view of 1120 mm.
I positioned myself on an area of the boardwalk at Hendrie Valley where I know a variety of species tend to congregate. As it turned out, there were a number of female cardinals in the area, along with the occasional male bird.
For the most part I was not overly concerned with composition and backgrounds in my photographs. Again, my primary purpose was to locate birds as quickly as possible and practice my eye/hand coordination at this long equivalent field-of-view.
Small birds are often more skittish than larger birds. Once a specific bird lands it will frequently only stay on that perch for a very limited amount of time. Sometimes only a few seconds.
When photographing wildlife, and specifically birds, it is critical to get the eye of the subject in focus. Even though cameras like the E-M1X have a joystick that works very efficiently moving a single auto-focus point into the right position, it can take me too much time with small birds, and I miss image opportunities as a result.
The Bird Detection AI on the E-M1X is much faster acquiring focus on a bird’s eye than I can do manually using the camera’s auto-focus joystick. This enables me to capture a much higher number of images of small, perched birds that are in proper focus.
As I became more accustomed with my eye/hand coordination shooting handheld at an equivalent field-of-view of 1120 mm, I found that I was more adept at positioning the bird in a better position in the frame in terms of composition. This produced more pleasing images. It does feel odd pointing my E-M1X at a subject bird and not having to think about moving any auto-focus points. Like birds, we are creatures of habit.
When I returned home and reviewed my images I was quite pleased with the number of good, usable photographs that had been able to capture. Not only that… I thoroughly enjoyed the experience! So much so that I intend on spending a lot more time photographing perched birds, rather than mainly focusing on birds-in-flight. Once COVID-19 restrictions allow of course.
You’ll notice that my distance to subject for most of the photographs in this article was in the 5 to 7 metre range (~16.4 to 23 feet). At the aperture and the focal length used, this produced a total depth-of-field of approximately 2 to 4 centimetres (~0.8 to 1.6 inches), with half of that behind the point of focus, and half in front. So, even with these small birds I was able to get sufficient depth-of-field to have their eyes and beaks in focus when shooting at an efov of 1120 mm from a reasonably close distance.
Proponents of full frame camera gear like to comment about the advantages of shallow depth-of-field. Few discuss the challenges associated with getting adequate depth-of-field when photographing landscapes, macro images, birds and nature with that camera format. Quite simply, wider angle lenses will always have deeper depth of field than longer focal length lenses when shot at the same aperture. This is true regardless of a camera’s sensor size.
So, using a M4/3 camera at a focal length of 560 mm (efov 1120) at f/9 will always have more depth of field than full frame gear at f/9 when using a focal length of 1120 mm, with the same distance to subject. Imagine viewing the photograph below if the bird’s eye was in focus, but not its beak. Deeper depth-of-field created by being able to use wider angle lenses to achieve the same efov is one of the practical advantages of using M4/3 gear for this genre of photography. Not to mention the increased portability of the equipment.
Without question photographing moving subjects in low light will always be an advantage for larger sensor cameras due to their low light capability. That’s not to say that M4/3 cameras cannot be used at higher ISO values. I purposely exposed the images in this article with faster shutter speeds than needed, to force higher ISO-values as part of my testing. Even at ISO-2500 to ISO-5000 these images are perfectly usable for my needs… and likely would meet the needs of many other photographers.
I absolutely love the added reach and flexibility that the M.Zuiko 100-400 mm f/5-6.3 IS brings to my bird and nature photography. Especially when used with the MC-14 teleconverter. It allows me capture a wider variety of photographs, and ramps up the ‘fun-o-meter’ to boot!
Technical Note
Photographs were captured hand-held using camera gear and technology as noted in the EXIF data. Images were produced from RAW files using my standard process. Crops are noted where appropriate.
How you can help keep this site advertising free
My intent is to keep this photography blog advertising free. If you enjoyed this article and/or my website and would like to support my work, you can purchase an eBook, or make a modest $10 donation through PayPal. Both are most appreciated. You can use the Donate button below. Larger donations can be made to tom@tomstirr.com through PayPal.
Word of mouth is the best form of endorsement. If you like our website please let your friends and associates know about our work. Linking to this site or to specific articles is allowed with proper acknowledgement. Reproducing articles, or any of the images contained in them, on another website or in any social media posting is a Copyright infringement.
Article and images are Copyright 2020 Thomas Stirr. All rights reserved. No use, duplication or adaptation of any kind is allowed without written consent. If you see this article reproduced anywhere else it is an unauthorized and illegal use. Posting comments on offending websites and calling out individuals who steal intellectual property is always appreciated!
Das sind ja ganz fantastische, super gute Fotos.
Da kann ich mit dem 100-400 doch nur zufrieden sein, wenn hier solche super guten Fotos gezeigt werden, oder lag es nur an der Kamera M1X? Kann ich nicht glauben. Das Objektiv wird in Ordnung sein.
LG Ruth
Translation of reader comment: Those are really fantastic, super good photos. I can only be satisfied with the 100-400 if such super good photos are shown here, or was it just the M1X camera? I can’t believe The lens will be fine.
Hi Ruth,
The M.Zuiko 100-400 mm f/5-6.3 IS is an excellent lens that can create nice, sharp images with good colour rendition. The optical quality of the this lens is better than other similar long telephoto zoom lenses that I’ve used in other camera formats.
The E-M1X’s Bird Detection AI does a wonderful job acquiring focus on a bird’s eye. We also need to consider that I used the M.Zuiko MC-14 teleconverter which allowed me to fill more of the frame with the subject birds. Working with RAW files in post can also have an impact on final results.
So, to answer your specific question, I think the M.Zuiko 100-400 mm f/5-6.3 IS is an excellent lens that can deliver terrific results. I cannot guarantee the results that another photographer would achieve with a different camera body, without using the MC-14, with different software, and with perhaps different skills in terms of hand holding and working in post.
Tom
Hallo Ruth,
Das M.Zuiko 100-400 mm 1: 5-6,3 IS ist ein ausgezeichnetes Objektiv, das schöne, scharfe Bilder mit guter Farbwiedergabe erzeugen kann. Die optische Qualität dieses Objektivs ist besser als bei anderen ähnlichen langen Telezoomobjektiven, die ich in anderen Kameroformaten verwendet habe.
Die Vogelerkennungs-KI des E-M1X leistet hervorragende Arbeit, um den Fokus auf das Auge eines Vogels zu lenken. Wir müssen auch berücksichtigen, dass ich den M.Zuiko MC-14-Telekonverter verwendet habe, mit dem ich mehr Rahmen mit den betroffenen Vögeln füllen konnte. Die Arbeit mit RAW-Dateien in der Post kann sich auch auf die Endergebnisse auswirken.
Um Ihre spezielle Frage zu beantworten, denke ich, dass das M.Zuiko 100-400 mm 1: 5-6,3 IS ein ausgezeichnetes Objektiv ist, das hervorragende Ergebnisse liefern kann. Ich kann nicht garantieren, dass ein anderer Fotograf mit einem anderen Kameragehäuse Ergebnisse erzielen würde, ohne den MC-14 zu verwenden, mit einer anderen Software und mit möglicherweise unterschiedlichen Fähigkeiten in Bezug auf das Halten von Händen und das Arbeiten in der Post.
Tom
thanks for information
You’re welcome!
Tom