Contract Manufacturing Realities

I have to roll my eyes when seeing negative comments about a branded photographic product rumored to be made by another company. Often indignation, disdain, or worse is expressed. I suppose there are still folks out there who are unaware of contract manufacturing realities.

NOTE: Click on images to enlarge. Photographs have been added to serve as visual breaks.

Nikon 1 J5 + 1 Nikkor 30-110 mm f/3.8-5..6 @ 51.2 mm, f/4.2, 1/60, ISO-1400, 16 mm extension tube used

A few decades ago I used to work for John Deere… one of the most well-known, trusted and venerated companies on the planet when it comes to agricultural equipment and other products that bear the John Deere name. The company earned its stellar reputation over many, many decades, and took great pains to protect and enhance it.

Nikon 1 V3 + 1 Nikkor CX 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 300 mm, efov 810 mm, f/5.6, 1/1600, ISO-250

Was every one of the thousands of John Deere branded products available back then, during my tenure, made in a John Deere owned and operated factory? No… of course not.

Olympus TG-5 @ 18 mm, efov 100 mm, f/4.9, 1/25, ISO-1600

Some products were produced under strict contract manufacturing agreements. We often started with an outside  company’s own best offering. Then tested and analyzed it… and developed a host of improvements that would need to be done before it could bear the John Deere name.

Nikon 1 V3 + 1 Nikon 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 300 mm, efov 810 mm, f/5.6, 1/1600, ISO-1400

Was the John Deere branded product marketed at a higher price than the base product produced by the other company. Absolutely. And, it was worth more because of the enhancements that were included in the John Deere version.

If we consider this approach in the photography market, the various enhancements could include compatibility with computational photography technologies and other in-camera capabilities that may not work without OEM firmware enablers.

Castlepoint, New Zealand, Nikon 1 V3 + 1 Nikkor 10-30 mm f/3.5-5.6 PD @ 23 mm, efov 62.1 mm, f/11, 1/160, ISO-160

Is there anyone alive today that is naive enough to believe that every single part in their vehicle was made by the company that puts its brand logo on the hood? Look at your stove. Your refrigerator. Your air conditioner, furnace or heat pump. The glasses that you use to see. And, a wide range of other products you own.

White-faced heron in flight along Seabird Coast, New Zealand, Nikon 1 V3 + 1 Nikkor CX 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 261 mm, efov 704.7 mm, f/5.6, 1/2000, ISO-160

How many of those products were made through contract manufacturing agreements? Or, were made in the same factory to differing specifications? Or simply rebranded with a different logo?

Nikon 1 V3 + 1 Nikkor CX 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 300 mm, efov 810 mm, f/5.6, 1/1600, ISO-3200

Many years ago I left John Deere to join a company with a stellar reputation in the commercial truck manufacturing business. Since I was going to have a long, daily commute I brought a new car. A diesel Volkswagen Jetta. One of my coworkers took me out for a congratulatory lunch.

Nikon 1 J5 + 1 Nikkor 10-100 mm f/4-5.6 @ 23 mm, efov 62.1 mm, f/5.6, 1/160, ISO-3200

On the way back into the corporate building he noticed my new car and commented, “Oh look… your Volkswagen Jetta has Porsche door handles.”

Nikon 1 J5 + 1 Nikkor 10-100 mm f/4-5.6 @ 60 mm, efov 162 mm, f/8, 1/80, ISO-1600

I smiled and replied, “Or, another way of looking at things is that your Porsche has Volkswagen door handles.” As a Porsche owner, he was not amused.  Such is the power of branding.

Olympus OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 40-150 mm f/2.8 with M.Zuiko 1.4X teleconverter @ 210 mm, efov 420 mm, f/5.6, 1/1600, ISO-3200

Contact manufacturing has been a part of the photographic industry for a long time. Often purposely hidden from view from the buying public.. all in the name of branding.

Nikon 1 V3 + 1 Nikon CX 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 234 mm, efov 632 mm, f/5.6, 1/2000, ISO-5000

The M.Zuiko 100-400 mm f/5-6.3 IS zoom lens that I own and very much enjoy using, has been rumored to be built by Sigma. Whether this is true or not is of absolutely no concern to me.  All I care about is how the lens performs optically, and under the rigorous field conditions to which it is exposed. Its compatibility with Olympus/OM System computational photography technology. And, what I am able to create with it.

Frame 10, Nikon 1 V3 + 1 Nikon CX 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 300 mm, efov 810 mm, f/6.3, 1/1600, ISO-280

Most of us own lenses that we assume are built by the company whose name is on the lens cap. This may, or may not be, the case.

Nikon 1 J5 + 1 Nikon 10-100 mm f/4-5.6 @ 14 mm, efov 38 mm, f/5.6, 1/2000, ISO-200

Well over a decade ago, a photo industry executive I knew, confidentially shared with me, that the third party brand with which he was associated had been building a number of products under contract manufacturing agreements for other brands.

Nikon 1 V3 + 1 Nikon CX 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 152 mm, efov 410 mm, f/5.6, 1/1600, ISO-500

There is nothing deceitful or insidious about this practice. Companies often subcontract some of their production to take advantage of another company’s expertise and cost base. The practice allows them to offer their customers a broader line up of products than otherwise could be produced.

Nikon 1 V3 + 1 Nikkor CX 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 300 mm, efov 810 mm, f/5.6, 1/1250, ISO-450

If companies did not engage in contract manufacturing, and tried to  produce all of their own products inhouse in their own factories, their costs would become prohibitively high on some offerings. This would lead to fewer products being offered in the marketplace. It is also quite possible that the price of some products would increase dramatically.

Nikon 1 V3 + 1 Nikkor CX 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 300 mm, efov 810 mm, f/5.6, 1/1250, ISO-200

There are also some opinions that all lenses should be custom designed for the sensor format on which they will be used. The thought is that adapting a full frame lens for a smaller size sensor camera  forces people to use lenses that are ‘unnecessarily too large’.

Nikon 1 V2 + 1 Nikkor CX 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 300 mm, efov 810 mm, f/5.6, 1/3200, ISO-280

Does that make any logical sense? That would mean that manufacturers of full frame and crop sensor cameras would need to develop completely parallel and duplicate line-ups of lenses for their APS-C and full frame users. Rather than utilize a common mount and most of their lens line-up, in order to serve the needs of both of their customer segments. The economic realities of that notion would result in a dramatic reduction of available products.

Burnside Presbyterian Church, New Zealand, Nikon 1 J5 + 1 Nikkor 10-100 mm f/4-5.6 @ 10 mm, efov 27 mm, f/8, 1/250, ISO-220

We’ll find out more on January 30 when OM System officially launches their new M.Zuiko 150-600 mm f/5-6.3 IS zoom lens. Those of us who are interested in the lens will review its specifications and capabilities, and assess the value proposition presented to us. Purchase decisions will then be made.

Nikon 1 J5 + 1 Nikkor 10-100 mm f/4-5.6 @ 40.6 mm, efov 109.6 mm, f/8, 1/200, ISO-800, extension tube used

The lens may make sense for some buyers… and not others. If you’re one of the latter… then don’t buy it. There… that was easy.

Technical Note

Photographs were captured handheld using camera gear and technology noted in the EXIF data. Images were produced from RAW  files using my standard process. This is the 1,351 article published on this website since its original inception in 2015.

How you can help keep this site advertising free

My intent is to keep this photography blog advertising free. If you enjoyed this article and/or my website and would like to support my work, you can purchase an eBook, or make a donation through PayPal. Both are most appreciated.

Sometimes all we need as photographers is a bit of inspiration. We hope you can find some of that inside Finding Visual Expression II.

Finding Visual Expression II is available for download for an investment of $11.99 CDN. The best viewing experience of this eBook will be at 100% using Adobe Acrobat Reader.

You may be interested in all of the 30 concepts covered in both of these related eBooks. If so, you may want to also consider Finding Visual Expression.

Finding Visual Expression is available for download for an investment of $11.99 Cdn. The best viewing experience of this eBook will be at 100% using Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Our other eBooks include Images of Ireland, New Zealand Tip-to-Tip, Nikon 1: The Little Camera That Could, Desert & Mountain Memories, Images of Greece, Nova Scotia Photography Tour, and a business leadership parable… Balancing Eggs.

If you click on the Donate button below you will find that there are three donation options: $7.50, $10.00 and $20.00. All are in Canadian funds. Plus, you can choose a different amount if you want. You can also increase your donation amount to help offset our costs associated with accepting your donation through PayPal. An ongoing, monthly contribution to support our work can also be done through the PayPal Donate button below.

You can make your donation through your PayPal account, or by using a number of credit card options.



Word of mouth is the best form of endorsement. If you like our website please let your friends and associates know about our work. Linking to this site or to specific articles is allowed with proper acknowledgement. Reproducing articles, or any of the images contained in them, on another website or in any social media posting is a Copyright infringement.

Article is Copyright 2024 Thomas Stirr.  Images are Copyright 2018-2019 Thomas Stirr or Rosemary Stirr. All rights reserved. No use, duplication or adaptation of any kind is allowed without written consent. If you see this article reproduced anywhere else it is an unauthorized and illegal use. Posting comments on offending websites and calling out individuals who steal intellectual property is always appreciated!

6 thoughts on “Contract Manufacturing Realities”

  1. I just use forums to get some information on new products or an issue with a camera etc.
    Trouble is they full of negative and know it all people who mostly spout off nasty utter rubbish.
    So i get on and get off a forum ASAP.

    1. Hi Stephen,

      Thanks for adding to the discussion. Since the inception of this website we’ve tried to ensure that it is safe, welcoming and supportive place for our readers. Hopefully you will enjoy visiting here.

      Tom

  2. Awesome article Thomas. Back in the 1970s, I worked for Hewlett Packard, and we would buy big printers and teletypes, add some good stuff to them and resell as Hewlett Packard products. I have no qualms buying products that has been rebranded as long as it fits my needs and budget.

    Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *