Dry Run

Doing a dry run with the camera equipment planned to be used for an extended photography tour, is always a prudent thing to do. Our initial gear assessments can have us lean in a certain direction. It’s not until we get out in the field and spend some time doing a dry run, that we can put our thought process to the test.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 300 mm, efov 600 mm, f/6.7, 1/1600, ISO-800, cropped to 4466 pixels on the width, subject distance 9.5 metres

In a recent article, I outlined my initial gear assessment for an upcoming, extended photography tour. My initial thoughts had me leaning pretty strongly towards the M.Zuiko PRO 12-100 mm f/4 and M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.8 II zoom lenses. As noted in that previous article, bird photography is not the primary focus for our upcoming tour. Capturing the occasional bird image would be the only reason for me to bring a long telephoto lens.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 300 mm, efov 600 mm, f/6.7, 1/1600, ISO-2500, cropped to 3946 pixels on the width, subject distance 31.8 metres

My initial thought was to travel as light as possible, and potentially forego the need for a camera bag, using my Cotton Carrier Lens Bag instead. So I packed up my planned 2 lens kit, along with some accessories in my Cotton Carrier Lens Bag, and headed off to 40 Mile Creek.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 246 mm, efov 600 mm, f/6.4, -0.3 EV, 1/1600, ISO-160, cropped to 3946 pixels on the width, subject distance 19.2 metres

It didn’t take more than 10 or 15 minutes of trying to do some quick, practice lens changes on my E-M1X for me to realize that my goal to travel ultra light was not going to work out as well as I had initially thought it would.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 300 mm, efov 600 mm, f/6.7, 1/1600, ISO-640, cropped to 4490 pixels on the width, subject distance 9.6 metres

While I regularly enjoy using the Cotton Carrier Lens Bag to carry additional batteries, memory cards, teleconverters, and a lens cleaning cloth… I found it awkward to use when trying to quickly change out a couple of medium sized lenses.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 300 mm, efov 600 mm, f/6.7, 1/1600, ISO-320, cropped to 3975 pixels on the width, subject distance 20 metres

Plus, the fumbling around between lenses created an unneeded risk of potentially dropping a lens during the change process. My dry run led me to decide that using my Tenba laptop backpack would be a more practical… albeit much larger… solution.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 300 mm, efov 600 mm, f/6.7, 1/2000, ISO-500, cropped to 4151 pixels on the width, subject distance 15.2 metres

Another important part of my dry run was to push my M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f.4.8-6.7 II pretty hard with some additional in-field testing. I did this by creating some practice images. These were focused mainly on late breaking birds-in-flight.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 200 mm, efov 400 mm, f/6.7, -0.3 EV, 1/1600, ISO-400, full frame capture, subject distance 10.5 metres

I was able to get some good BIF images, but my dry run created more questions than provide answers. I realized that I have become spoiled by the quick and accurate auto-focusing performance of my M.Zuiko 150-600 mm f/5-6.3 IS.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 240 mm, efov 480 mm, f/6.7, 1/2000, ISO-500, cropped to 4374 pixels on the width, subject distance 14.9 metres

This lens is too large for me to bring on our upcoming photo tour, but it did cause me question whether I would be happy with the noticeable auto-focusing lag when trying to photograph late breaking birds-in-flight with the M.Zuiko 75-300 II.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 240 mm, efov 480 mm, f/6.4, 1/2000, ISO-320, cropped to 4858 pixels on the width, subject distance 12.8 metres

I was finding that by time the 75-300 II would grab focus, late breaking subject birds were already past me some of the time. This was more noticeable in lower light, or when a bird was flying directly towards me, or at a sharp angle. At one point during my dry run I began to question whether I needed to bring any lens for potential bird photography at all.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 240 mm, efov 480 mm, f/6.4, 1/2000, ISO-1000, cropped to 3897 pixels on the width, subject distance 14.9 metres

Or… if focusing my efforts on landscape photography with the M.Zuiko PRO 7-14 mm f/2.8 and PRO 12-100 f/4 would be a better pairing for my needs during our upcoming photography tour. I was not expecting this conundrum to surface… but I’m glad it did.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 234 mm, efov 468 mm, f/6.4, 1/2000, ISO-320, cropped to 3649 pixels on the width, subject distance 6.5 metres

As I continued my dry run, I reminded myself that it was critical to remain open minded, and not allow myself to get wrapped up in cognitive dissonance created by my previous line of thought. The objective of my dry run was to get a deeper understanding of the practical ramifications of my lens choices, by trying to replicate how I would be shooting during our upcoming photography tour.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 300 mm, efov 600 mm, f/6.9, 1/2000, ISO-160, cropped to 3483 pixels on the width, subject distance 14.9 metres

I began to question whether bringing my M.Zuiko PRO 12-100 f4 IS was actually a ‘no brainer’ decision. I wondered if the M.Zuiko PRO 12-40 f/2.8 and the M.Zuiko PRO 40-150 f/2.8 with MC-20 teleconverter would be a better overall solution. So, I went back home and fitted my E-M1X with the M.Zuiko PRO 40-150 mm f/2.8 and MC-20 teleconverter… then returned to the harbour for more field testing.

OM-D E-M1X + M.Zuiko 75-300 mm f/4.8-6.7 II @ 300 mm, efov 600 mm, f/6.7, 1/1600, ISO-400, cropped to 4742 pixels on the width, subject distance 19.9 metres

Doing a dry run can cause some internal mental gyrations. Re-assessing our needs and questioning our previous assumptions is not always easy to do. It is a healthy process… which  eventually leads to the right decision.

Technical Note

Photographs were captured handheld with the camera equipment  noted in the EXIF data. All images were created from RAW files using my standard process in post. This is the 1,423 article published on this website since its original inception in 2015.

How you can keep this website advertising free

My intent is to keep this photography blog advertising free. If you enjoyed this article and/or my website and would like to support my work, you can purchase an eBook, or make a donation through PayPal (see Donate box below). Both are most appreciated. Sometimes all we need as photographers is a bit of inspiration. We hope you can find some of that inside Finding Visual Expression II.

Finding Visual Expression II is available for download for an investment of $11.99 CDN. The best viewing experience of this eBook will be at 100% using Adobe Acrobat Reader.

You may be interested in all of the 30 concepts covered in both of these related eBooks. If so, you may want to also consider Finding Visual Expression.

Finding Visual Expression is available for download for an investment of $11.99 Cdn. The best viewing experience of this eBook will be at 100% using Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Our other eBooks include Images of Ireland, New Zealand Tip-to-Tip, Nikon 1: The Little Camera That Could, Desert & Mountain Memories, Images of Greece, Nova Scotia Photography Tour, and a business leadership parable… Balancing Eggs.

If you click on the Donate button below you will find that there are three donation options: $7.50, $10.00 and $20.00. All are in Canadian funds. Plus, you can choose a different amount if you want. You can also increase your donation amount to help offset our costs associated with accepting your donation through PayPal. An ongoing, monthly contribution to support our work can also be done through the PayPal Donate button below.

You can make your donation through your PayPal account, or by using a number of credit card options.



Word of mouth is the best form of endorsement. If you like our website please let your friends and associates know about our work. Linking to this site or to specific articles is allowed with proper acknowledgement. Reproducing articles, or any of the images contained in them, on another website or in any social media posting is a Copyright infringement.

Article and images are Copyright 2024 Thomas Stirr. All rights reserved. No use, duplication or adaptation of any kind is allowed without written consent. If you see this article reproduced anywhere else it is an unauthorized and illegal use. Posting comments on offending websites and calling out individuals who steal intellectual property is always appreciated!

8 thoughts on “Dry Run”

  1. I can identify with your desire to travel light on occasions and still have a decent range of focal lengths. I have also arrived at the choice of the OM lenses, 40-150mm, f2.8, the 12-40mm, f2.8, and the 2X teleconverter. However, I have arrived at a different solution to your Cotton Carrier. I have a Lowepro lens case that fastens to my belt loop at my side for the spare lens. Then I have a pair of 5.11 brand pants with 4 extra pockets on the thigh area in addition to the 4 standard pockets. Then I select a shirt with 2 breast pockets. All the extra pockets accomodate the 2X extender and miscellaneous small items.

  2. I’m interested in reading your article on post processing 1423.
    I would appreciate if you could give me a link to it.

  3. That’s an introduction to an interesting perspective about going out and kind of practicing Thomas, I saw you used the 75-300 for your images they came out very well, I suppose the bright conditions helped ?
    I have been doing the same walking to the branch on a local pond that does have some Kingfisher activity , trying different times during a couple of days – no luck yet
    Thanks for the post

    1. Hi Mark,

      I went out during the time that we’d normally be shooting when on a photography tour… i.e. between 9 and 5. The M.Zuiko 75-300 f/4.8-6.7 II worked well for typical static bird images or BIF when I had time to track and lock on them. As noted in the article, quick turn and shoot movements were not as successful as I’ve experienced with other lenses. Overall it was an interesting dry run.

      Tom

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *